Work scorecard

Mia checks the cost, risk, approval line, and whether an AI employee can clear the first version.

If this is cheaper or safer with a person, the scorecard says that.

A short check for cost, speed, quality, risk, and the first safe version.

7 min

Replies, reports, checks, handoffs, document chases, approvals, or follow-up that keeps coming back.

Staff time, manager attention, customer wait time, rework, missed follow-ups, or lost revenue.

Better drafts, faster turnaround, fewer errors, cleaner handoffs, and less chasing from managers.

Customer promises, pricing, refunds, legal language, financial decisions, or anything that can damage trust.

Output: work to clear, current cost, approval line, pricing shape, and the smallest useful test.

The work has to be clearer than the automation.

A useful AI employee starts with a real stuck task.

Name what piles up, what it costs now, and what still needs approval.

Clear enough that a person, process, or AI employee could be measured against it.

Time, rework, customer delay, missed revenue, manager attention, or hiring pressure.

Lower cost, faster response, fewer misses, cleaner handoff, higher close rate, or less manager attention.

The AI employee can do preparation while humans approve promises, pricing, advice, money, or edge cases.

The first version saves visible time while keeping review, audit, and quality controls in place.

Send the work, current cost, delay, and risk.

Mia checks whether an AI employee can clear the first version safely and cheaply enough to test.